1.2 Small Group · Group 2
Second Challenge Form · Non-Routine Extension · Same Standard, New Problems
quantity · relationship · Procedural Fluency · Real-World Applications
- You already can do this. So we go up a level, not up a number: find what is always true, show it a second way, and be ready to defend it with a reason instead of an answer.
- A bowl is full of peas — far too many to count one at a time. About how many peas are in the bowl?
- I do not count every pea — I look for a group I CAN count, like one small cluster of about 10.
- Then I ask how many of those clusters would cover the whole bowl. I count about 12.
- 12 clusters of about 10 is 12 × 10 = 120, so my estimate is about 120 peas — a reasoned answer, close enough to be useful.
- 76 = 100 + 5.76.
- 76 = 105 + 0.76.
- 76 = 110 − 4.24.
- 76 = 52.88 × 2, and 105.76 = 211.52 ÷ 2.
- Same number, five different breaks. Find one more of your own.
- Now prove it: say why that move had to work at all — not just that it did.
- Sentence frame — convince a skeptic: "My method works because ___ . It would stop working if ___ ."
- quantity (cantidad) — An amount in a problem — a number with a meaning attached, like 540 meters.
- relationship (relación) — How two quantities compare or connect to each other.
- strategy (estrategia) — A plan for how to solve a problem before you start computing.
- reasonable (razonable) — A solution that makes sense in the context of the problem.
- persevere (perseverar) — To keep working on a problem, checking your progress and adjusting your plan when you get stuck.
- Expecting a fraction of a number to be bigger than the number — 5/6 × 540 must be LESS than 540 because 5/6 is less than 1; only a fraction greater than 1, like 6/5, makes the product bigger.
-
1 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which set shows FIVE different correct decompositions of 105.76?
- A100 + 5.76, 105 + 0.76, 110 − 4.24, 52.88 × 2, 211.52 ÷ 2
- B100 + 5.76, 105 + 7.6, 110 − 4.24, 52.88 × 2, 211.52 ÷ 2
- C100 + 5.76, 105 + 0.76, 110 + 4.24, 52.88 × 2, 211.52 ÷ 2
- D100 + 5.76, 105 + 0.76, 110 − 4.24, 52.88 × 3, 211.52 ÷ 2
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
2 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Without computing the exact heights, order the three new buildings from shortest to tallest. (London: 5/6 of 540 m, Rio de Janeiro: 9/10 of 540 m, Tokyo: 6/5 of 540 m.)
- ALondon, Rio de Janeiro, Tokyo
- BRio de Janeiro, London, Tokyo
- CTokyo, Rio de Janeiro, London
- DLondon, Tokyo, Rio de Janeiro
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps
-
3 OPEN RESPONSE
The lesson says we check on our progress toward a solution and adjust our plan as needed. Describe one way YOU can check on your progress while solving a problem.
✏️ Mathematical Justification & Response -
4 OPEN RESPONSE
A classmate says, "In math, only the final answer matters." Using this lesson, write what you would say back.
✏️ Mathematical Justification & Response -
5 OPEN RESPONSE
Write your own Comparing Walks problem: describe three people using only relationships (shorter than, longer than), so a reader can put them in order without any exact distances. Then give one set of values that fits.
✏️ Mathematical Justification & Response -
6 ERROR ANALYSIS
Fix our table's thinking
- 1The problem:You calculate 5/6 × 540 and get 650 meters. What does the checking step of your plan tell you?
- 2A classmate at our table answered:The answer is fine because 650 is a bigger number than 5/6
Which step contains the error? Explain the mathematical misconception and write the correct calculation below.
✏️ Corrected Mathematical Work & Explanation
Writing Task: Justify why your mathematical solution is accurate and complete.