6.AT.7
Lesson 6-8-group1
🟡 Group 1 · Support & Scaffolding
MASTERY CHECK
☐ Exceeds☐ Meets Target☐ Needs Practice
6.8 Small Group · Group 1
Tier 2 Intervention · Concrete-Representational-Abstract (CRA) · Dual-Language Anchors
Properties of Operations · Commutative Property · Procedural Fluency · Reasoning & Critique
■ CONCEPT SUMMARY & GUIDED NOTES: Let's build it together — What are the properties of operations?
1Changing the order or the grouping of numbers being added or multiplied does not change the answer.
- Properties are math rules that are always true. The Commutative Property lets you change the order. The Associative Property lets you change the grouping (the parentheses). We'll walk through a worked example, try one together, then you'll try a few with hints right there when you need them.
2Worked Example — Watch me
- I have 3 guitarists, 5 drummers, and 2 keyboard players.
- I can add them as 3 + 5 + 2, which gives 10.
- The Commutative Property says order does not matter: 5 + 3 + 2 also gives 10.
- The Associative Property says grouping does not matter: (3 + 5) + 2 = 3 + (5 + 2), both equal 10.
3Mathematical Word Bank
- Properties of Operations (Propiedades de las operaciones) — Rules that let you reorder or regroup numbers without changing an expression's value.
- Commutative Property (Propiedad conmutativa) — You can change the order and get the same answer.
- Associative Property (Propiedad asociativa) — You can change the grouping and get the same answer.
- Identity Property (Propiedad de identidad) — Adding 0 or multiplying by 1 keeps the same value.
- Property (Propiedad) — A rule that is always true in math.
- Distributive Property (Propiedad distributiva) — Multiplying a number by everything inside the parentheses: a(b + c) = ab + ac.
4Watch out
- A common mistake in Properties of Operations is applying the commutative property where it does not belong, or confusing it with the associative property. Students often assume 15 − 8 = 8 − 15 (it does not: 7 ≠ −7 — commutative only works for addition and multiplication), or they see parentheses move and call it "associative" even when the numbers inside just swapped places, like (2 + 3) + 4 = (3 + 2) + 4 (that is commutative — the order inside the parentheses changed, not the grouping). Before you label a property, ask: did only the order change (commutative), did only the grouping change (associative), or was a 0 or 1 involved (identity)?
SECTION 1
CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING & VISUAL MODELS
[Visual Modeling]
-
1 DRAG SORT
Sort each equation by the property it shows.
-
2 DRAG SORT
Match each equation with the property it demonstrates.
SECTION 2
REAL-WORLD CONTEXTS & PROBLEM SOLVING
[Applications]
-
3 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which property is shown? 5 + 13 = 13 + 5
- ACommutative Property
- BAssociative Property
- CIdentity Property
- DDistributive Property
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
4 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which property is shown? (6 × 3) × 2 = 6 × (3 × 2)
- AAssociative Property
- BCommutative Property
- CIdentity Property
- DDistributive Property
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
5 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which property is shown? 47 + 0 = 47
- AIdentity Property
- BCommutative Property
- CAssociative Property
- DDistributive Property
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
6 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which property lets you rearrange 8 × 5 to 5 × 8?
- ACommutative Property
- BAssociative Property
- CIdentity Property
- DDistributive Property
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps
🗣️ MATHEMATICAL DISCOURSE & TALK MOVES
SMP.3 / Construct Viable Arguments
Group Discussion Prompt: How does your visual model justify your mathematical solution?
🗣️ Partner A:
Partner A: "I modeled this by identifying the relationship and..."
Partner A: "I modeled this by identifying the relationship and..."
👂 Partner B:
Partner B: "I agree with your step because the standard mathematical rule states..."
Partner B: "I agree with your step because the standard mathematical rule states..."
✍️ The Writing Revolution (TWR) · Sentence Expansion
Because · But · So
Complete each sentence stem to demonstrate precise mathematical reasoning:
BECAUSE
The ratio remains equivalent because both quantities are scaled by the exact same multiplicative factor.
BUT
Two ratios may look similar, but inverting the order of terms fundamentally changes the comparison.
SO
The recipe requires 3 parts flour to 2 parts water, so the unit rate is 1.5 cups of flour per cup of water.
📐 CER MATHEMATICAL PROOF MATRIX (CER 2.0)
SMP.3 / Proof & Justification
Writing Task: Justify why your mathematical solution is accurate and complete.
C Claim
Starter: My mathematical claim is that the solution is...
E Evidence
Starter: The evidence from the model/table demonstrates that...
R Reasoning
Starter: This proves my answer because the standard mathematical definition of...