7.2 Small Group · Group 2
Second Challenge Form · Non-Routine Extension · Same Standard, New Problems
Visual Models · Rational Numbers on the Number Line · Rational number · Procedural Fluency
- You already can do this. So we go up a level, not up a number: find what is always true, show it a second way, and be ready to defend it with a reason instead of an answer.
- I will plot -2.5 on the number line.
- First, the whole numbers it falls between: -2.5 is between -2 and -3.
- The .5 means halfway, so I split the space between -2 and -3 in half.
- I place my dot exactly halfway between -2 and -3. That is -2.5.
- Now let's plot 0.75. Which two whole numbers is it between? It is between 0 and 1.
- What does 0.75 mean? It is 3/4 of the way from 0 to 1.
- So we split 0 to 1 into 4 equal parts and place the dot at the 3rd mark.
- Now prove it: say why that move had to work at all — not just that it did.
- Sentence frame — convince a skeptic: "My method works because ___ . It would stop working if ___ ."
- Rational Numbers on the Number Line (Números racionales en la recta numérica) — Every rational number has one exact spot on the number line. Writing it as a fraction, a decimal, or an integer does not change where it sits.
- Rational number (Número racional) — A number that can be written as a fraction of two integers, with a bottom number that is not zero.
- Fraction (Fracción) — A number that shows part of a whole, like 3/4.
- Decimal (Decimal) — A number with a dot, like 0.5, that shows a part less than one.
- Number line (Recta numérica) — A straight line where numbers are placed in order; numbers get smaller to the left and larger to the right.
- Equivalent (Equivalente) — Having the same value, just written a different way.
- A common mistake in Rational Numbers on the Number Line is treating the numerator and denominator of a negative fraction as two separate whole numbers instead of one value between two integers — for example, plotting -3/4 by going to -3 and then counting 4 more units to the left, landing (incorrectly) at -7, instead of recognizing that -3/4 = -0.75, which sits between 0 and -1. Before you submit an answer, find the two whole numbers your value falls between, then split that space into equal parts.
-
1 MULTIPLE CHOICE
The first trail marker sits between 0 and 1. Which rational number belongs there?
- A3/4
- B1.5
- C-1/2
- D2
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
2 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Order these three trail markers from least to greatest: -1.5, 0.5, -0.5.
- A-1.5, -0.5, 0.5
- B0.5, -0.5, -1.5
- C-0.5, -1.5, 0.5
- D-1.5, 0.5, -0.5
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
3 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Which rational number is closest to 0 on the number line?
- A-1/4
- B0.5
- C-2
- D1.75
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps
-
4 ERROR ANALYSIS
Fix our table's thinking
- 1The problem:Which rational number is closest to 0 on the number line?
- 2A classmate at our table answered:0.5
Which step contains the error? Explain the mathematical misconception and write the correct calculation below.
✏️ Corrected Mathematical Work & Explanation -
5 OPEN RESPONSE
A classmate says: 'The more digits after the decimal point, the smaller the number — look at 0.5 and 0.25.' Find a pair of numbers where that reasoning gives the WRONG answer, and write what is actually true. Where would each of your numbers sit on the number line?
✏️ Mathematical Justification & Response -
6 ERROR ANALYSIS
Spot the Mistake: Plotting -2.25
- 1Problem:Plot -2.25 on the number line.
- 2Student thinking:It is negative, so I go past -2. The .25 is one quarter, so I count toward 0 (to the right) by a quarter unit and land between -2 and -1.
- 3Student answer:Point plotted at -1.75, between -2 and -1.
Which step contains the error? Explain the mathematical misconception and write the correct calculation below.
✏️ Corrected Mathematical Work & Explanation
Writing Task: Justify why your mathematical solution is accurate and complete.