8.6 Small Group · Group 2
Tier 1 Extension · Non-Routine Synthesis · Misconception Traps · Rigorous CER Proofs
Solve and Graph Inequalities · Solve · Procedural Fluency · Reasoning & Critique
- You already can do this. So we go up a level, not up a number: find what is always true, show it a second way, and be ready to defend it with a reason instead of an answer.
- Solve x + 3 > 53. The inverse of adding 3 is subtracting 3.
- I subtract 3 from both sides: x + 3 − 3 > 53 − 3, so x > 50.
- The symbol > does not include 50, so I use an open circle at 50.
- 'Greater than' shades right. Check: x = 60 gives 60 + 3 = 63 > 53. True!
- Solve x − 5 ≤ 8. What is the inverse of subtracting 5?
- We add 5 to both sides: x ≤ 8 + 5, so x ≤ 13.
- ≤ includes 13, so we use a closed circle and shade left.
- Substitute x = 10: 10 − 5 = 5 ≤ 8. True?
- Now prove it: say why that move had to work at all — not just that it did.
- Sentence frame — convince a skeptic: "My method works because ___ . It would stop working if ___ ."
- Solve and Graph Inequalities (Resolver y representar desigualdades) — Isolate the variable, then show the complete solution set on a number line.
- Solve (Resolver) — To find the number that makes it true.
- Graph (Graficar) — To show answers on a number line with circles and shading.
- Solution (Solución) — A number that makes the equation or inequality true.
- Substitute (Sustituir) — To put a number in place of a letter.
- Solution set (Conjunto solución) — All the numbers that make the inequality true.
- A common mistake in Solve and Graph Inequalities is shading the number line in the wrong direction after solving. For example, a student solves x + 4 > 10 correctly to get x > 6, but then shades LEFT toward smaller numbers instead of RIGHT toward greater numbers. The shading direction always matches the solved symbol, not the original problem: '>' and '≥' shade right (greater numbers), '<' and '≤' shade left (smaller numbers) — check this AFTER you solve, not before. To catch this mistake, substitute one shaded value and one unshaded value back into the original inequality: the shaded value should make it true, and the unshaded value should make it false.
-
1 FILL TABLE
Solve each inequality, describe the inverse operation, and describe the graph.
Inequality Inverse Operation Solution Graph Description x + 11 ≥ 20 x − 3 < 7 x + 8 ≤ 20 ✏️ Scratchpad / Reasoning -
2 DRAG SORT
Solve each inequality, then test if x = 10 is a solution.
- x + 2 > 8 (x > 6)
- x − 5 ≥ 3 (x ≥ 8)
- x + 1 ≤ 15 (x ≤ 14)
- x + 3 > 15 (x > 12)
- x − 2 ≥ 9 (x ≥ 11)
- x + 6 < 10 (x < 4)
-
3 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Final gate — describe the solution set. The vault rule is x > 7. What does the solution set mean?
- AAll numbers greater than 7, like 8, 9, 10, … (but NOT 7 itself)
- BOnly the number 7
- CAll numbers less than 7
- DEvery number, including 7
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps
-
4 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Clue 1: Which value is a solution of x > 7?
- A9
- B7
- C5
- D3
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
5 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Clue 2: Is 5 a solution of x ≤ 5?
- AYes, because 5 ≤ 5 is true
- BNo, because 5 is not less than 5
- CNo, because ≤ means only smaller numbers
- DYes, but only because 5 is odd
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps
-
6 ERROR ANALYSIS
Level 2 Extension — Catch the Boundary Mistake
- 1Vault rule:x > 7
- 2Test the boundary value:Substitute x = 7: 7 > 7
- 3Rookie's conclusion:7 > 7 is true, so 7 IS a solution and opens the gate.
- 4Mark the solution set:The detective adds 7 to the list of solutions.
Which step contains the error? Explain the mathematical misconception and write the correct calculation below.
✏️ Corrected Mathematical Work & Explanation
Group Discussion Prompt: How does your visual model justify your mathematical solution?
Partner A: "I modeled this by identifying the relationship and..."
Partner B: "I agree with your step because the standard mathematical rule states..."
Complete each sentence stem to demonstrate precise mathematical reasoning:
Writing Task: Justify why your mathematical solution is accurate and complete.