9.4 Small Group · Group 2
Second Challenge Form · Non-Routine Extension · Same Standard, New Problems
solution · substitute · Procedural Fluency · Real-World Applications
- You already can do this. So we go up a level, not up a number: find what is always true, show it a second way, and be ready to defend it with a reason instead of an answer.
- The number of cars produced depends on the number of hours of operation. Every hour, the plant produces 2.5 cars.
- Let h = hours and c = cars. The equation is c = 2.5h. Check with the table: 8 hours gives 2.5 × 8 = 20 cars per shift.
- The order needs 1,000 cars, so substitute: 2.5h = 1,000.
- Divide both sides by 2.5: h = 1,000 ÷ 2.5 = 400 hours.
- Interpret it: 400 hours running 24 hours a day is about 17 days — about 2.5 weeks. That fits inside 3 weeks only if the plant runs 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
- Last year the council washed 34 cars and raised $408. What did they charge per car? Divide: 408 ÷ 34 = $12.
- At $12 per car, let n = cars washed and t = total raised: t = 12n.
- The goal is $500, so 12n = 500 means n = 500 ÷ 12, which is about 41.7 — so they must wash at least 42 cars, because 41 cars raise only 41 × 12 = $492.
- Or fix the cars instead: if they predict 35 cars, then 35p = 500 gives p = 500 ÷ 35, about $14.29 — so they must charge at least $14.30 per car.
- Now prove it: say why that move had to work at all — not just that it did.
- Sentence frame — convince a skeptic: "My method works because ___ . It would stop working if ___ ."
- solution (solución) — A value of the variable that makes an equation true.
- substitute (sustituir) — To replace a variable with a number so you can compute.
- at least (al menos) — That amount or more — the smallest amount that still works.
- predict (predecir) — To make a reasonable guess about a future amount using information you already have.
- justify (justificar) — To explain WHY an answer or recommendation makes sense, using the mathematics.
- Adding the rate instead of multiplying — writing 2.5 + 8 = 10.5 cars for an 8-hour shift instead of 2.5 × 8 = 20. The rate applies to EVERY hour, so the total is always rate × amount.
-
1 MULTIPLE CHOICE
The solution to one problem was 41.7 cars. Would producing or washing a PARTIAL car make sense?
- ANo — cars come in whole numbers, so round up to the next whole car
- BYes — 0.7 of a car is a real amount you can wash
- CNo — so round down and accept a smaller total
- DYes — the equation is wrong if it gives a decimal
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
2 MULTIPLE CHOICE
Would you recommend the student council charge $12 or $14.30 per car? Which reasoning is strongest?
- AEither can work: $12 needs at least 42 cars washed, while $14.30 needs only about 35 — so the choice depends on how many customers they expect
- B$12 is always better because a smaller number is always better
- C$14.30 is always better because more money per car is always better
- DNeither price can reach the $500 goal
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
3 MULTIPLE CHOICE
The order requires 1,000 cars. Using 2.5h = 1,000, how many hours will the plant need?
- A400 hours
- B2,500 hours
- C997.5 hours
- D40 hours
My work — one step per line What I did to both sides -
4 MULTIPLE CHOICE
The plant needs 400 hours to fill the order. Running 24 hours a day, about how many days is that?
- AAbout 17 days
- B400 days
- C50 days
- D4 days
✏️ Workspace & Solution Steps -
5 MULTIPLE CHOICE
The goal is $500 at $12 per car. Using 12n = 500, at least how many cars must be washed?
- A42 cars
- B41 cars
- C40 cars
- D50 cars
per 1
-
6 ERROR ANALYSIS
Fix our table's thinking
- 1The problem:The order requires 1,000 cars. Using 2.5h = 1,000, how many hours will the plant need?
- 2A classmate at our table answered:2,500 hours
Which step contains the error? Explain the mathematical misconception and write the correct calculation below.
✏️ Corrected Mathematical Work & Explanation
Writing Task: Justify why your mathematical solution is accurate and complete.